Jacoby Transfers
     
 
  this page was last updated: 29-June-2006
 
     
 
If you wish you can view the pdf file or else download the Word Doc file for printing.
 
     
     
     
 

Jacoby Transfers

 
  This is an extract from the ‘Beginner's Pages' and the basic Jacoby transfers convention is briefly covered. Jacoby transfers are covered in much more detail in chapter 3 of the advanced NoTrump bidding book.  
     
  When partner opens 1NT then he has said it all – a balanced hand in the 15-17 point range (playing a strong NoTrump), with at least two cards in every suit.  
     
 
Hand 1 Hand 2 Hand 3 Hand 4 Hand 5
                   
982 J92 K92 K92 K92
Q10852 AQ1052 AQ1052 AQ1052 AQ1052
J87 J87 J87 A107 A107
Q9 95 95 Q5 A5
 
     
  Consider these five hands after partner has opened 1NT (15-17). They all have a decent 5 card suit and either 's or NT could possibly be the final contract with all five. But Hand 1 is weak, Hand 2 is invitational, Hand 3 is worth game, Hand 4 is slam invitational and Hand 5 is definitely worth slam. So how do we inform partner that we have a suit and then also tell partner about our strength?  
     
  With traditional natural methods you bid naturally. So 1, weak with hand 1. With Hands 3,4 and 5 you bid 3, forcing. Quite what you are meant to do with hand 2 is undefined. Just toss a coin? Of course it's totally unworkable, you cannot define weak, invitational and strong hands with just two bids (2& 3 ); the solution was found by Oswald Jacoby. With all of these hands your first bid is 2 , a transfer that says that you have 5 's (any strength) and requests partner to bid 2 , regardless of his strength or holding. The same applies with a suit, when 2 is the transfer bid.  
     
  Once opener complies with our transfer request, we then show the strength of our hand. In all of these examples we have a 5 card suit. Our initial transfer promises at least 5 cards in the suit and so we do not repeat it. All of these hands are relatively balanced and so NoTrump is the natural rebid.  
     
  How does the bidding progress with our 5 example hands?  
     
 
Hand 1: 1NT - 2 - 2 - pass. This hand is not strong enough to bid again. You need 8-9 points to invite and so the only options are to pass the original 1NT or to transfer and then pass. Transferring usually works out best.
 
   
Hand 2: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 2NT. An invitational sequence. With a minimal hand, opener may either pass or bid 3 . With a maximum he bids either 3NT or 4.
 
   
Hand 3: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 3NT. This shows game values with 5 's. If opener has 4 's he will convert to 4; if opener has only 2 's he will pass 3NT; if opener has 3 's he usually chooses to go for the 5-3 fit but may pass 3NT with good holdings in the other suits.
 
 
     
 
Hand 4: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 4NT. This is a slam invitation showing a 5 card suit.
   
Hand 5: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 4 . As we use 4NT as a natural slam invitation this is Gerber, asking for aces on the way to slam. Ace asking conventions (Blackwood and Gerber) are covered elsewhere.
 
 
     
  Fine, but what does responder do if he has an unbalanced hand and so does not want to bid No Trump at his 2nd turn? Perhaps a 6 card suit, or a 2nd suit? Llet's have a look at responding hands that are not relatively balanced: -  
     
 
Hand 6 Hand 7 Hand 8 Hand 9 Hand 10 Hand 11
                       
2 J9 92 92 J9 92
Q10852 AQ1052 AQ1052 AQ1052 AQ10652 AQ10652
J8754 J872 KJ874 AK107 872 KJ87
Q9 95 9 A5 95 9
 
     
  Consider the first 4 hands after partner has opened 1NT (15-17). They all have a decent 5 card suit but this time they also have a 2 nd suit, so how should we bid them?  
     
  They all have a decent 5 card suit and either 's, 's or No Trump could possibly be the final strain with all four. But Hand 6 is weak, Hand 7 is invitational, Hand 8 is worth game and Hand 9 is worth slam. How do we inform partner that we have a suit plus a suit and then also tell partner about our strength?  
     
  We start off with a 2 transfer bid with all of the hands.  
     
  Once opener complies with our transfer request, we then show the strength of our hand. In the examples 6-9 we have a 5 card suit. Our initial transfer promises at least 5 cards in the suit and we can now bid our 2 nd suit naturally (if we are strong enough). But be careful, a transfer followed by a 2 nd suit is always game forcing.  
     
  So how does the bidding progress with our first 4 example hands (6-9)?  
     
 
Hand 6: 1NT - 2 - 2 - pass. This hand is not strong enough to bid again. You need 8-9 points to invite and it's best to play unbalanced hands in a suit contract. You are not strong enough to look for a fit as a 3 bid would be game forcing.
 
   
Hand 7: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 2NT. An invitational sequence, you cannot bid 's as that would be game forcing; you really have no option but to treat the hand as balanced. With a minimal hand, opener may either pass or bid 3 . With a maximum he will bid either 3NT or 4 .
 
   
Hand 8: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 3. This shows game values with 5 's and 4+ 's. Partner should know enough to select the best game contract - 3NT, 4 or (rarely) 5 .
 
   
Hand 9: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 3. This sequence starts off the same, you inform partner of your two suits and later investigate the best slam.
 
 
     
 

The last two hands (10&11) have a 6 card suit, how do we handle them? We start with a transfer and then bid the suit naturally - 3 is invitational to game and 4 is to play: -

   
Hand 10: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 3. This shows an invitational hand with 6 's. Partner will either pass or bid 4 .
 
   
Hand 11: 1NT - 2 - 2 - 4. This shows game values with 6 's. Partner will normally pass. If you play Texas Transfers then this sequence is mildly slam invitational.
 
     
  Remember, you need a 6 card suit to transfer and then bid the suit again. If you transfer and then bid a new suit, this is game forcing  
     
  For a much more extensive coverage of transfers, refer to chapter 3 of the No Trump bidding book.  
     
     
 
 
   
  Pattaya Bridge Club - www.pattayabridge.com
 
     
 
to conventions